Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Prudential Hotels Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Prudential Hotels Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Delhi) The ITAT Delhi dismissed the Revenue’s appeal and upheld the CIT(A)’s order deleting addition of ₹7.70 crore made u/s 68 and restricting disallowance u/s 14A. The AO had treated repayment of “advance against equity” from certain parties as unexplained cash credits alleging lack of identity, genuineness and creditworthiness. However, the Tribunal noted that the amounts represented repayment of advances given in earlier years and not fresh credits during the year; therefore section 68 could not be invoked. The assessee had furnished supp...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930