This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Loan Repayment Not Taxable U/s 68 & 14A Disallowance Restricted to Actual Expenditure
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- DCIT Vs Prudential Hotels Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2017-18
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Delhi
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
DCIT Vs Prudential Hotels Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Delhi)
The ITAT Delhi dismissed the Revenue’s appeal and upheld the CIT(A)’s order deleting addition of ₹7.70 crore made u/s 68 and restricting disallowance u/s 14A. The AO had treated repayment of “advance against equity” from certain parties as unexplained cash credits alleging lack of identity, genuineness and creditworthiness. However, the Tribunal noted that the amounts represented repayment of advances given in earlier years and not fresh credits during the year; therefore section 68 could not be invoked. The assessee had furnished supp...




