Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Om Parkash Saini Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Om Parkash Saini Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh) The Chandigarh SMC Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench allowed the appeal of Om Parkash Saini for AY 2017-18 and deleted the addition of ₹7,26,090 made under section 69A and taxed under section 115BBE on account of cash deposits during the demonetisation period. During demonetisation, the assessee had deposited ₹11.30 lakh in his bank account. The Assessing Officer accepted agricultural income of ₹4.03 lakh and treated the balance ₹7.26 lakh as unexplained. The CIT(A) confirmed the addition. Before the Tribunal, the ass...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Tenancy Rights Transfer Taxable Only on Possession: STCG Addition Deleted JDA May Trigger Transfer- But No Double Taxation Allowed: Karnataka HC Relief CIT(A) Enhancement Quashed for No Notice – ITAT Restores LTCG Issues to AO No Penalty When Quantum Deleted: 270A Cannot Survive Without Addition Heavy Contract Payments by Trust Under Scanner: Matter Remanded for Verification View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930