Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Om Parkash Saini Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Om Parkash Saini Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh) The Chandigarh SMC Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench allowed the appeal of Om Parkash Saini for AY 2017-18 and deleted the addition of ₹7,26,090 made under section 69A and taxed under section 115BBE on account of cash deposits during the demonetisation period. During demonetisation, the assessee had deposited ₹11.30 lakh in his bank account. The Assessing Officer accepted agricultural income of ₹4.03 lakh and treated the balance ₹7.26 lakh as unexplained. The CIT(A) confirmed the addition. Before the Tribunal, the ass...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Cash Withdrawn Earlier Cannot Become ‘Unexplained Cash’ on Re-Deposit: ITAT Bangalore SC Slams Casual Sanction of ₹8 Cr Loan After Borrower Defaults From Day One Inheritance Isn’t a Birthright When a Valid Will Exists: SC Interest on Bank Deposits Can Still Qualify for 80P Deduction- Bangalore ITAT Gives Relief to Credit Co-operative Society SC: Interest on Borrowed Funds Allowed Even for Investment Through Group Concerns – Commercial Expediency Prevails View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031