Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Bajaj Finance Limited Vs PCIT-3 (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2019-20
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Bajaj Finance Limited Vs PCIT 3 (ITAT Pune) Section 263 Cannot Be Invoked Where AO’s View Is Plausible: ITAT Pune Quashes PCIT Revision in Bajaj Finance Case The Pune Bench of the ITAT quashed the revisionary order passed u/s 263 against Bajaj Finance Ltd. for AY 2019-20, holding that the assessment order was neither erroneous nor prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue. The PCIT had invoked section 263 on two grounds: (i) alleged excess allowance of deduction u/s 36(1)(viia) in respect of provision for bad and doubtful debts (including standard assets), and (ii) alleged lack of verifica...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930