Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Gaurav Dalmia (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Gaurav Dalmia (ITAT Delhi) For AY 2016-17, the assessee’s original scrutiny assessment had already been completed under section 143(3) in 2018, making it an unabated year on the date of search in March 2021. In the subsequent section 153A assessment, the AO added ₹100 crore under section 69A based on a loose sheet (Annexure A-1, page 14) seized not from the assessee but from the residence of an employee, treating entry no. 31 (“Others – 100,00,00,000”) as alleged cash received on sale of shares. The Tribunal held that although material found from a third person can be conside...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930