Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs Shann Jewellers (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO Vs Shann Jewellers (ITAT Delhi) Loan Repayments Explained from Stock Sales and Fresh Borrowings; Demonetisation Cash Sales Accepted as Genuine The Assessing Officer made two major additions for AY 2017-18: (i) ₹2.15 crore treating repayment of unsecured loans as unexplained under section 68, and (ii) ₹1.74 crore treating part of demonetisation-period cash sales as unexplained cash deposits taxable under section 68 read with section 115BBE. On the first issue, the CIT(A) analysed comparative balance sheets and cash flows and found that the firm had generated funds by reducing its closin...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Mass Relief on 234E Fees: ITAT Deletes Levy for Pre-01.06.2015 Period DVO Valuation Without Notice Invalid: Matter Remanded for Fresh Determination Section 56(2)(x): Stamp Value on Booking Date to Apply – ITAT Deletes Addition Past Savings Accepted: Small Cash Introduction Cannot Be Treated as Unexplained Reassessment for AY 2015-16 Time-Barred – ITAT Quashes Entire Penny Stock Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930