Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Priti Suresh Purohit Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Priti Suresh Purohit Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) Presumptive Income Upheld; Technical Reopening Issues- JAO vs FAO- Kept Open Pending Supreme Court—ITAT Deletes Section 69A Addition under 44AD The Mumbai SMC Bench of the ITAT allowed the assessee’s appeals for AYs 2020-21 to 2022-23, holding that receipts duly offered under the presumptive taxation scheme of section 44AD cannot be treated as unexplained money under section 69A, merely on the basis of a statement recorded during search. The assessee, a small labour contractor, had declared gross receipts of ₹4.78 lakh and offered ₹1.25 lakh ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Wrong Mention of Section 69 Instead of 69A Does Not Invalidate Addition: ITAT Hyderabad Gift from Mother Cannot Be Treated as Unexplained Investment: ITAT Hyderabad Temporary Cash Support for Student Visa Is Not a Loan Under Section 269SS: ITAT Chennai Section 69A Cannot Be Invoked for Cash Withdrawals from Own Bank Account Income Declared in Original Return Cannot Be Reduced in Section 148 Return: ITAT Hyderabad View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031