Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Abdul Salam Mohamed Yasin Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Abdul Salam Mohamed Yasin Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Reassessment Time-Barred Under Rajeev Bansal; Sanction by PCIT Invalid: ITAT Mumbai Quashes Notice u/s 148 for AY 2017-18 The Mumbai ITAT (“A” Bench) allowed the appeal of the assessee for AY 2017-18 and annulled the reassessment proceedings on purely jurisdictional grounds, holding that the notice issued under section 148 was barred by limitation and further vitiated by invalid sanction under section 151(ii). The Tribunal examined the complete chronology in light of the Supreme Court decisions in Ashish Agarwal and Union of India v. Rajeev B...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Tenancy Rights Transfer Taxable Only on Possession: STCG Addition Deleted JDA May Trigger Transfer- But No Double Taxation Allowed: Karnataka HC Relief CIT(A) Enhancement Quashed for No Notice – ITAT Restores LTCG Issues to AO No Penalty When Quantum Deleted: 270A Cannot Survive Without Addition Heavy Contract Payments by Trust Under Scanner: Matter Remanded for Verification View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930