Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Abdul Salam Mohamed Yasin Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Abdul Salam Mohamed Yasin Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Reassessment Time-Barred Under Rajeev Bansal; Sanction by PCIT Invalid: ITAT Mumbai Quashes Notice u/s 148 for AY 2017-18 The Mumbai ITAT (“A” Bench) allowed the appeal of the assessee for AY 2017-18 and annulled the reassessment proceedings on purely jurisdictional grounds, holding that the notice issued under section 148 was barred by limitation and further vitiated by invalid sanction under section 151(ii). The Tribunal examined the complete chronology in light of the Supreme Court decisions in Ashish Agarwal and Union of India v. Rajeev B...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Mumbai ITAT Allows ESOP Deduction; Discounts on Employee Stock Options Are Not Contingent Liabilities Mumbai ITAT Quashes Reassessment for Wrong Approval U/s 151(ii); Penalties U/s 270A & 271AAC Also Deleted Section 10(10D): Should Life Insurance Exemption Cover Entire Maturity Proceeds or Only Income? Section 68 Addition on Loans From Wife and Company Deleted: Delhi ITAT Section 271D Penalty Quashed as Six-Month Limitation Expired: Bengaluru ITAT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031