Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sasi Kiran Sunkara Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2022-23
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sasi Kiran Sunkara Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad) ITAT Hyderabad: Unexplained Fixed Deposits—Matter Remanded to Verify Parental Funding and Money Trail The Hyderabad Bench of the ITAT set aside the NFAC/CIT(A) order sustaining an addition of ₹6.40 crore as unexplained investment under section 69 for AY 2022-23. The assessee had made substantial fixed deposits in Union Bank of India and claimed the source to be funds received from his parents—₹1 crore from his father and the balance from his mother, including amounts arising from sale of her properties. While the lower authorities rejected th...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Mass Relief on 234E Fees: ITAT Deletes Levy for Pre-01.06.2015 Period DVO Valuation Without Notice Invalid: Matter Remanded for Fresh Determination Section 56(2)(x): Stamp Value on Booking Date to Apply – ITAT Deletes Addition Past Savings Accepted: Small Cash Introduction Cannot Be Treated as Unexplained Reassessment for AY 2015-16 Time-Barred – ITAT Quashes Entire Penny Stock Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930