Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sasi Kiran Sunkara Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2022-23
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sasi Kiran Sunkara Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad) ITAT Hyderabad: Unexplained Fixed Deposits—Matter Remanded to Verify Parental Funding and Money Trail The Hyderabad Bench of the ITAT set aside the NFAC/CIT(A) order sustaining an addition of ₹6.40 crore as unexplained investment under section 69 for AY 2022-23. The assessee had made substantial fixed deposits in Union Bank of India and claimed the source to be funds received from his parents—₹1 crore from his father and the balance from his mother, including amounts arising from sale of her properties. While the lower authorities rejected th...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SCN u/s 74 GST Valid even if based on Material from allegedly Illegal Search or from another Commissionerate-Karnataka HC Sec 13(1)(c) Not Attracted for Higher Profit to Related Concerns: HC Karnataka HC Quashes TDS Refund on Land Acquisition Over Suppression; ₹5L Cost Assessment Order Passed in Name of Deceased Assessee Held Void – Karnataka HC LTCG Cannot Be Taxed in Wife’s Hands When Property Settled by Husband – ITAT Deletes Rs. 19.86 Cr Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
March 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031