Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Amarjot Singh Sohi Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Amarjot Singh Sohi Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh) On-Money Addition Fails Without Proof: Third-Party Excel Sheet Not Enough The Chandigarh Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) deleted the addition of ₹8 lakh made under section 69 read with section 115BBE, holding that the Revenue failed to prove any actual cash payment (“on-money”) by the assessee for purchase of a shop. The reassessment was initiated solely on the basis of information arising from a search on the seller group (Omaxe Ltd.), wherein an Excel sheet recovered from a third party allegedly reflected cash payments. The ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Mass Relief on 234E Fees: ITAT Deletes Levy for Pre-01.06.2015 Period DVO Valuation Without Notice Invalid: Matter Remanded for Fresh Determination Section 56(2)(x): Stamp Value on Booking Date to Apply – ITAT Deletes Addition Past Savings Accepted: Small Cash Introduction Cannot Be Treated as Unexplained Reassessment for AY 2015-16 Time-Barred – ITAT Quashes Entire Penny Stock Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930