Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Amarjot Singh Sohi Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Amarjot Singh Sohi Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh) On-Money Addition Fails Without Proof: Third-Party Excel Sheet Not Enough The Chandigarh Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) deleted the addition of ₹8 lakh made under section 69 read with section 115BBE, holding that the Revenue failed to prove any actual cash payment (“on-money”) by the assessee for purchase of a shop. The reassessment was initiated solely on the basis of information arising from a search on the seller group (Omaxe Ltd.), wherein an Excel sheet recovered from a third party allegedly reflected cash payments. The ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031