Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs Munjal Holdings (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ACIT Vs Munjal Holdings (ITAT Delhi) Wrong Sanction Under Amended Section 151 Is Fatal: ITAT Upholds Quashing of Reassessment Despite Rajeev Bansal The Delhi Bench “E” of the ITAT, in ACIT v. Munjal Holdings (AY 2016-17), dismissed the Revenue’s appeal and upheld the CIT(A)’s order quashing the reassessment, holding that the notice under section 148 dated 30.07.2022 was void for want of proper sanction under amended section 151(ii). The assessee’s original assessment under section 143(3) had accepted the returned income. Reassessment was later initiated based on information alleging ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930