Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Venkata Prasad Pulipati Vs ITO (ITAT Visakhapatnam)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Venkata Prasad Pulipati Vs ITO (ITAT Visakhapatnam) Wrong Boss Signed, Reopening Dies: ITAT Quashes 148 for Want of PCIT/PCDG Sanction The Visakhapatnam Bench of the ITAT quashed the reassessment framed u/s 147 r.w.s. 144B for AY 2016-17 on the ground of lack of valid sanction u/s 151. The notice u/s 148 dated 27-07-2022 was issued beyond three years from the end of the relevant AY. As per Section 151(ii) (post-Finance Act, 2021), such reopening mandatorily requires approval of the Principal Chief Commissioner / Principal Director General (or CCIT/DG). In the present case, the approval was obt...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930