Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Deepti Agrawal (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Deepti Agrawal (ITAT Delhi) Suspicion can’t replace proof: ITAT Delhi upholds genuine LTCG on Capital Tradelink & Alankit shares Delhi Tribunal dismissed the Revenue’s appeal and upheld the deletion of additions made on account of alleged bogus long-term capital gains. The AO had treated LTCG of ₹3.73 crore from sale of shares of Capital Tradelink Pvt. Ltd. and Alankit Ltd. as non-genuine and also added alleged accommodation entry expenses u/s 69C. The Tribunal noted that the CIT(A) had rightly relied on coordinate bench decisions in the assessee’s own case for earlier year...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930