Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Selvaraj Arokia Sagaya Raj Vs DCIT (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Selvaraj Arokia Sagaya Raj Vs DCIT (ITAT Chennai)

Reassessment Quashed for Violation of Mandatory Seven-Day Period under Section 148A(b)

The ITAT, Chennai held that the reassessment proceedings for AY 2018-19 were invalid due to non-compliance with the mandatory requirement of Section 148A(b). The Assessing Officer issued the notice on 30.03.2022 and required the assessee to respond by 31.03.2022, granting only one day instead of the statutorily prescribed minimum period of “not less than seven days”. Rejecting the Revenue’s contention that the timelin

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

Experienced professional with over 3 years of Post qualification experience in handling Assessments, dealing CIT(A) and ITAT Appeals. View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Central Circle Not Exempt from Faceless Reassessment Regime: ITAT Hyderabad Appeal Dismissal for Non-Prosecution Invalid When Notices Sent to Wrong Email Address Telangana HC Quashes Section 148 Unsigned Reassessment Notice ITAT Hyderabad Dropped Penalties When Compliance Made Before Assessment Ends ₹3.49 Cr Cash Seizure Backed by Cash Book & Debtor Realisations: ITAT Deletes Sec 69A Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031