Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : R.A.K. Ceramics India Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
R.A.K. Ceramics India Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad) Section 144C can’t override 153: TP final order for AY 2018-19 quashed as time-barred by ITAT Hyderabad The appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench, concerned Assessment Year 2018–19 and raised a purely legal issue relating to limitation for passing the final assessment order in a transfer pricing case governed by the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) mechanism. The material facts were undisputed. For the relevant assessment year, the last date for passing the final assessment order, if computed under sect...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Self-Employed Income Requires Up to Three-Year ITR Average for Motor Accident Compensation: SC A Registered Will Is Not Beyond Suspicion: SC 8% Income Estimate Based Solely on Bank Deposits Remanded: ITAT Bangalore Additions Made in Intimation U/s 143(1) Cannot Be Challenged in Appeal Against Scrutiny Assessment: ITAT Bangalore 2002 Haryana Remission Policy Governs; Contrary Earlier Ruling Per Incuriam: SC View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031