Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Javeed Khan Ahemad Khan Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-2018
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Javeed Khan Ahemad Khan Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)

₹3.32 Cr 69A Addition Not Decided on Merits— Legal Grounds Not Examined- Matter Restored for Fresh Hearing

Assessee did not file ROI for AY 2017-18. Based on cash deposits of ₹3,10,81,973 & other deposits of ₹21,79,000, AO issued notices u/s 148A(d) & 148. Assessee did not respond to 148A proceedings or to 142(1). AO completed best-judgment assessment u/s 147 r.w.s. 144 r.w.s. 144B, adding ₹3,32,60,973 u/s 69A as unexplained money.

Before CIT(A)/NFAC, assessee partly complied & challenge

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Recorded Sales Cannot Be Taxed Again U/s 68; Additions Based Only on Third-Party Statement Deleted On-Money Addition for Flat Purchase Deleted; Builder’s General Statement Alone Not Enough Bogus Purchase Cases: Only Profit Element Taxable; 4% GP Addition Upheld Assessment on Amalgamated Company Held Void for Lack of Jurisdiction Penalty for Non-Compliance Deleted as Venial Breach Where Assessments Accepted Returned Income View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031