Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Arun Gupta (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

DCIT Vs Arun Gupta (ITAT Delhi)

Revenue filed appeals against CIT(A)’s order deleting protective additions made in the hands of Arun Gupta. AO had made protective additions in Assessee’s hands & substantive additions in M/s Transline Technologies Ltd. Assessee relied on Tribunal’s order in DCIT Vs Transline Technologies Ltd. (ITA 3693/Del/2025, order dated 07.11.2025), wherein Tribunal—following Delhi HC judgment in Ojjus Medicare Pvt Ltd (161 taxmann.com 160)—held that AYs 2011-12 & 2012-13 fall beyond the permissible 10-year block u/s 153C, Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Recorded Sales Cannot Be Taxed Again U/s 68; Additions Based Only on Third-Party Statement Deleted On-Money Addition for Flat Purchase Deleted; Builder’s General Statement Alone Not Enough Bogus Purchase Cases: Only Profit Element Taxable; 4% GP Addition Upheld Assessment on Amalgamated Company Held Void for Lack of Jurisdiction Penalty for Non-Compliance Deleted as Venial Breach Where Assessments Accepted Returned Income View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031