Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kumar Gaurav Sharma Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2019-20
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Kumar Gaurav Sharma Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) FTC Cannot Be Denied for Delay in Form 67: Directory, Not Mandatory- Form 67 Filed Before 143(1) Processing — Pune ITAT Orders FTC Allowance Pune Tribunal dealt with denial of FTC of Rs.8,57,902 by CPC on ground that Form 67 was filed after due date u/s 139(1). Assessee, employed with Amazon India & later Amazon USA, offered global salary to tax & filed Form 67 on 26.02.2020, before filing ROI on 20.03.2020. AO processed return u/s 143(1) on 25.02.2021 but denied FTC citing late Form 67; rectification u/s 154 was also rejected. Addl./JCIT(A) uph...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SC Slams Casual Sanction of ₹8 Cr Loan After Borrower Defaults From Day One Inheritance Isn’t a Birthright When a Valid Will Exists: SC Interest on Bank Deposits Can Still Qualify for 80P Deduction- Bangalore ITAT Gives Relief to Credit Co-operative Society SC: Interest on Borrowed Funds Allowed Even for Investment Through Group Concerns – Commercial Expediency Prevails Penalty for Unsecured Loans Not Automatic Merely for Section 68 Addition: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031