Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

ITAT Rejects AO’s Demand for Third-Party Documents; Section 68 Addition Deleted

Case Law Details

Case Name
Jay Kundan Bhatt Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2020-2021
Advertisement
Jay Kundan Bhatt Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Section 68 Cannot Tax Past-Year Figures; Third-Party Books Not Required from Assessee—Identity & Genuineness Already Proved Assessee’s assessment u/s 143(3) resulted in additions of Rs.22,45,300 u/s 68 towards unsecured loans, including Rs.6,45,300 being difference in loan balance with his father, Shri Kundan Bhatt. Tribunal noted from ledger accounts  & earlier assessment orders (AYs 2017-18 to 2019-20) that the same difference of Rs.6,45,300 was repeatedly added in past years but deleted by CIT(A) as it did not arise from any transactions o...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 5,510

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *