Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Rakesh Jain Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Rakesh Jain Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT Mumbai Strikes Down ₹3.49 Crore Section 68 Addition—Demonetisation Cash Deposits Held as Genuine Recorded Sales; 115BBE Re-Taxation Unsustainable The Tribunal held that the ₹3.49 crore cash deposit stands fully explained as recorded cash sales, duly supported by audited books, VAT Form-704, stock register, cash book and sales invoices. The AO rejected books without issuing show-cause, violating natural justice, and then invoked Section 68 on rejected books, which is impermissible in law. The ITAT noted that the difference in figures was only due to ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

Experienced professional with over 3 years of Post qualification experience in handling Assessments, dealing CIT(A) and ITAT Appeals. View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Central Circle Not Exempt from Faceless Reassessment Regime: ITAT Hyderabad Appeal Dismissal for Non-Prosecution Invalid When Notices Sent to Wrong Email Address Telangana HC Quashes Section 148 Unsigned Reassessment Notice ITAT Hyderabad Dropped Penalties When Compliance Made Before Assessment Ends ₹3.49 Cr Cash Seizure Backed by Cash Book & Debtor Realisations: ITAT Deletes Sec 69A Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930