Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Dilbag Singh Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Dilbag Singh Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh) ITAT Chandigarh dealt with addition of ₹3.19 Lakh u/s 69 r.w.s. 115BBE out of total demonetization-period cash deposit of ₹14.19 Lakh. AO accepted agricultural income to that extent & added the balance ₹3.19 Lakh as unexplained. CIT(A) confirmed the addition. Assessee did not appear before Tribunal. Tribunal noted that Assessee himself admitted inability to explain source of ₹3.19 Lakh; hence the addition could not be deleted. However, Tribunal held that the enhanced rate of 60% u/s 115BBE is not applicable to transactions prior to 01.04.2017, ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Bangalore Remands ₹49L Sec 68 Addition & ₹3.74L TDS Disallowance for Fresh Verification Vague Purpose in Form 10? ITAT Gives Trust a Second Chance Foreign Tax Credit Cannot Be Denied for Late Form 67 – Bang ITAT Allows Substantive Relief CIT(A) Cannot Enhance on New Issue; JDA Additions & U/s 2(22)(e) Deletions Upheld No Exempt Income = No U/s 14A Disallowance – ITAT Bangalore Reaffirms Settled Law View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930