Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Dilbag Singh Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Dilbag Singh Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh) ITAT Chandigarh dealt with addition of ₹3.19 Lakh u/s 69 r.w.s. 115BBE out of total demonetization-period cash deposit of ₹14.19 Lakh. AO accepted agricultural income to that extent & added the balance ₹3.19 Lakh as unexplained. CIT(A) confirmed the addition. Assessee did not appear before Tribunal. Tribunal noted that Assessee himself admitted inability to explain source of ₹3.19 Lakh; hence the addition could not be deleted. However, Tribunal held that the enhanced rate of 60% u/s 115BBE is not applicable to transactions prior to 01.04.2017, ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930