Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Birju Kumar Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Birju Kumar Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata)

Ex-Parte 144 Order & 115BBE Addition Set Aside- Demonetisation Cash Deposit Addition Remanded—ITAT Patna Gives Assessee One Final Chance

Assessee, engaged in jewellery & mobile business, filed ROI declaring ₹5,24,260. Case was selected under CASS. Due to non-compliance to statutory notices, AO completed ex-parte assessment u/s 144, treated cash deposits of ₹49,80,700 made during demonetisation as unexplained u/s 68, taxed it @ 60% u/s 115BBEPlease become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Recorded Sales Cannot Be Taxed Again U/s 68; Additions Based Only on Third-Party Statement Deleted On-Money Addition for Flat Purchase Deleted; Builder’s General Statement Alone Not Enough Bogus Purchase Cases: Only Profit Element Taxable; 4% GP Addition Upheld Assessment on Amalgamated Company Held Void for Lack of Jurisdiction Penalty for Non-Compliance Deleted as Venial Breach Where Assessments Accepted Returned Income View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031