Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Neelanchal High Rise LLP Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Neelanchal High Rise LLP Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore) Only TDS Issue Scrutinised— CPC Adjustments on 36(1)(va), 43B & 40(a)sustained Without Enquiry- Remanded for Proper Verification Assessee LLP filed return on 30.05.2021. CPC made adjustments u/s 143(1) amounting to Rs.32,15,117/-. Case was later selected for scrutiny under CASS to examine business receipts subject to TDS. Notices u/s 143(2) & 142(1) were issued on 29.06.2021 & 27.10.2021. Assessee responded on 01.12.2021 with documents. AO accepted the CPC-determined income & completed assessment u/s 143(3) on 02.09.2022 but r...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930