Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Neelanchal High Rise LLP Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Neelanchal High Rise LLP Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore) Only TDS Issue Scrutinised— CPC Adjustments on 36(1)(va), 43B & 40(a)sustained Without Enquiry- Remanded for Proper Verification Assessee LLP filed return on 30.05.2021. CPC made adjustments u/s 143(1) amounting to Rs.32,15,117/-. Case was later selected for scrutiny under CASS to examine business receipts subject to TDS. Notices u/s 143(2) & 142(1) were issued on 29.06.2021 & 27.10.2021. Assessee responded on 01.12.2021 with documents. AO accepted the CPC-determined income & completed assessment u/s 143(3) on 02.09.2022 but r...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930