Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Chowdadenahally Rangaswamy Manohar Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Chowdadenahally Rangaswamy Manohar Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) Voluntary Concession Binds Assessee: ITAT Bangalore Rejects Attempt to Retract in appeal – CBDT Circular 14 No Shield—Assessee’s Own Letter Sinks Appeal Assessee, a film producer & partner in a real-estate firm, filed return declaring Rs.13,49,557/-. Search u/s 132 took place on 15.03.2016. Assessment was completed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 153A on 29.12.2017 at Rs.5,14,90,650/-, wherein AO noted large cash payments supported only by self-made vouchers. During assessment, Assessee voluntarily accepted that 20% of cash expenses w...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930