This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Section 271AAB Penalty Not Automatic Without Incriminating Material: ITAT Indore
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Mukesh Kumar Ranka Vs ACIT (ITAT Indore)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2017-18
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Indore
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Mukesh Kumar Ranka Vs ACIT (ITAT Indore)
The Tribunal examined the rival submissions and case records, focusing on the scope and applicability of penalty under section 271AAB of the Income-tax Act. The Bench first referred to two key judicial precedents to outline the legal position on the interpretation of “undisclosed income” and the mandatory or discretionary nature of penalty under the provision. In the Jaipur Bench decision in Rajendra Agarwal v. DCIT, authored by the same Judicial Member, it was held that penalty under section 271AAB cannot be imposed unless the inco...




