Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Section 271AAB Penalty Not Automatic Without Incriminating Material: ITAT Indore

Case Law Details

Case Name
Mukesh Kumar Ranka Vs ACIT (ITAT Indore)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2017-18
Advertisement Mukesh Kumar Ranka Vs ACIT (ITAT Indore) The Tribunal examined the rival submissions and case records, focusing on the scope and applicability of penalty under section 271AAB of the Income-tax Act. The Bench first referred to two key judicial precedents to outline the legal position on the interpretation of “undisclosed income” and the mandatory or discretionary nature of penalty under the provision. In the Jaipur Bench decision in Rajendra Agarwal v. DCIT, authored by the same Judicial Member, it was held that penalty under section 271AAB cannot be imposed unless the inco...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Sandeep Kanoi
Qualification: CA in Job / Business
Company: Taxguru Consultancy
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra
Articles Published: 18,651

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *