Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Amol Ceramica Private Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Amol Ceramica Private Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)

Assessee appealed against the NFAC (CIT(A)) order dated 05.02.2025 confirming an addition of ₹50,00,000 u/s 68 as unexplained cash credit, arising from a purported loan received from M/s Aneri Fincap Ltd., a company later identified by the Department as a paper entity providing accommodation entries.

AO had reopened the assessment on the basis of information received from the Investigation Wing, Mumbai, following a search on One World Group, where statements of Shri Rajesh G. Mehta revealed that several shell companies-inc

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Revision u/s 263 Quashed: AO’s Plausible View on 80P Deduction Cannot Be Substituted by PCIT-Bang Trib Section 153C Additions Fail Without Corroboration and Cross-Examination Recorded Sales Cannot Be Taxed Again U/s 68; Additions Based Only on Third-Party Statement Deleted On-Money Addition for Flat Purchase Deleted; Builder’s General Statement Alone Not Enough Bogus Purchase Cases: Only Profit Element Taxable; 4% GP Addition Upheld View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031