Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ravinder Kaur Bhasin Vs ACIT/NFAC (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ravinder Kaur Bhasin Vs ACIT/NFAC (ITAT Delhi) Assessee appealed against the NFAC order dated 30.12.2024 confirming an addition of ₹61,00,000 u/s 69 as unexplained investment towards property purchase. The assessment had been reopened u/s 147 on information that Assessee purchased an immovable property of the said value but failed to file a return or respond to notices. AO, finding no compliance, made the addition & completed the assessment u/s 144/147. Before Tribunal, Assessee contended that both AO & CIT(A) ignored documentary evidence showing that the investment was financed thro...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Tenancy Rights Transfer Taxable Only on Possession: STCG Addition Deleted JDA May Trigger Transfer- But No Double Taxation Allowed: Karnataka HC Relief CIT(A) Enhancement Quashed for No Notice – ITAT Restores LTCG Issues to AO No Penalty When Quantum Deleted: 270A Cannot Survive Without Addition Heavy Contract Payments by Trust Under Scanner: Matter Remanded for Verification View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930