Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Amol Ceramica Private Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Amol Ceramica Private Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Assessee appealed against the NFAC (CIT(A)) order dated 05.02.2025 confirming an addition of ₹50,00,000 u/s 68 as unexplained cash credit, arising from a purported loan received from M/s Aneri Fincap Ltd., a company later identified by the Department as a paper entity providing accommodation entries. AO had reopened the assessment on the basis of information received from the Investigation Wing, Mumbai, following a search on One World Group, where statements of Shri Rajesh G. Mehta revealed that several shell companies-including Aneri Fincap...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930