The Tribunal held that the first appellate authority has a statutory duty to decide grounds on merits and cannot dismiss them as not adjudicated for want of details. Orders violating sections 250(6) and 251(1) were set aside and remanded for fresh adjudication.
The Tribunal held that reassessment under Sections 147/144B is void if no notice under Section 143(2) is issued. Acting on a return filed or adopted in response to Section 148 triggers mandatory jurisdictional compliance.
The Tribunal held that extended block assessment beyond six years is invalid where escaped income is below ₹50 lakh. Jurisdiction under Sections 153A/153C cannot be assumed without meeting statutory limits.
Where real estate sale proceeds and donations are transparently reflected in financial statements, unexplained money provisions fail. The decision reinforces limits on Revenues powers based on conjecture.
The court held that reopening an assessment on the same facts amounts to an impermissible change of opinion. Arbitrary second reassessment notices were quashed with ₹1 lakh costs imposed to deter harassment.
ITAT affirmed that assessments for block period years must be framed only under Section 153C. Any assessment completed under Section 143(3) during such period is void in law.
The tribunal ruled that reassessment notices for AY 2015-16 issued after 31 March 2022 are barred by limitation. The key takeaway is that TOLA extensions do not apply to this assessment year.
Advance ruling held QIAshredder cannot function independently and works only with a centrifuge. It was classified as parts under CTH 84219900, not 84212900.
This landmark development shows how the absence of legislation led courts to step in. The key takeaway is that workplace safety for women was recognised as a fundamental rights obligation.
This article compares finance roles in startups and corporates across skills, growth, and work culture. The key takeaway is that career fit matters more than brand or salary alone.