Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Ashutosh Foods (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Ashutosh Foods (ITAT Delhi) Reassessment Quashed for Non-Issue of 143(2) – Return Filed After 148 Notice Still Triggers Mandatory Jurisdictional Requirement The Delhi ITAT dismissed the Revenue’s appeal and allowed the assessee’s cross-objection by quashing the reassessment for AY 2015-16 on the ground that no notice under Section 143(2) was issued after the assessee responded to notice under Section 148. The Tribunal noted that although the assessee did not file a fresh return within 30 days of the 148 notice, it had subsequently requested that the original return filed under S...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930