Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Radhika Roy Vs DCIT (Delhi High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Radhika Roy Vs DCIT (Delhi High Court) Reopening Quashed with Costs – Delhi HC Slams Department, Imposes ₹1 Lakh Cost per Case for Arbitrary Second Reassessment The Delhi High Court quashed the second reassessment notices issued under Section 148 for AY 2009-10 against Radhika Roy and Prannoy Roy, holding that the reopening was wholly without jurisdiction and based on a mere change of opinion. In the first reassessment completed under Section 147/143(3) on 30.03.2013, the Assessing Officer had specifically examined the issue of interest-free loans received from RRPR, issued a show-cause no...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Quashes U/s 153C Assessments: AO Cannot Simply Copy Satisfaction Note Reopening Quashed: AO Added Share Capital, Loan & Premium Without Understanding Transaction Nature WhatsApp Chats, Screenshots & Suspicion Can’t Prove On-Money: ITAT Jaipur ITAT Directs TDS Refund Despite Delayed E-Verification; Revenue Cannot Retain Tax on Technical Grounds ITAT Quashes Reassessment: Approval from PCIT Instead of PCCIT Renders Section 148 Notice Invalid View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930