Allahabad High Court rules in favor of a family’s claim for insurance money under the UPVAT Act after the registered dealer’s death, stating registration must be valid on the date of death.
CESTAT Kolkata quashes the rejection of a refund claim on Special Additional Duty (SAD) paid for shoe imports, citing non-inclusion of an allegation in the show cause notice.
CESTAT Kolkata case – Mishra & Mishra (Agency) Enterprises vs. Commissioner of Customs. Learn how CHA licenses cannot be revoked without direct involvement.
CESTAT Chandigarh’s ruling in Lufthansa German Airlines vs. Commissioner of Service Tax clarifies that service tax doesn’t apply to passenger service fees & airport taxes.
Delhi High Court quashes an assessment order under the Income Tax Act for AY 2014-15 due to early filing. Detailed analysis and implications. Learn more.
In a landmark ruling, the Delhi High Court held that government shareholders are not automatically considered related parties under Section 92E of the Income Tax Act, 1961. This decision has significant implications for companies with government shareholding.
ITAT Mumbai’s decision on assessment in the name of a deceased assessee. Analysis of the case, legal implications, and implications for legal heirs. Learn more.
Kerala High Court instructs expeditious resolution of an income tax appeal, directing the appellate authority to decide within two months, based on recent legal precedents.
Read about CESTAT Mumbai’s ruling in Jaika Motors Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, quashing a service tax demand on incentive amounts due to non-inclusion of the activity under ‘BAS’.
Kerala High Court orders Customs to provisionally release a seized vehicle in the case of Shabin S. vs. Joint Commissioner of Customs under section 110A of the Customs Act.
