ITAT Delhi held that rejection of Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Method for valuation of share price unjustified as that the methodology adopted was a recognized method of valuation and the Revenue was unable to show that the assessee adopted a demonstrably wrong approach.
ITAT Jaipur held that invocation of section 263 of the Income Tax Act unjustified as all the details were furnished by the assessee during scrutiny assessment and assessment was completed after detailed enquiry.
CESTAT Ahmedabad held that imposition of penalty under section 112(b) of the Customs Act, 1962 on the proprietorship firm without even recording the statement of the proprietor of the firm is unsustainable and liable to be quashed.
CESTAT Chennai held that boiler in unassembled form is removed in several lots on different dates doesn’t mean that parts only and not the whole boiler is cleared from factory. The parts are to be classified as complete machine under 8402.10. Hence, exemption vide Sl.No.84 of Notification No.6/2006-CE dated 1.3.2006 as amended duly available.
Gujarat High Court held that misconduct charges against the auditor not sustained stating the Statute provides remedy of appeal is only available to a member of ICAI against the decision of the Board Discipline or Disciplinary Committee imposing any penalty. The same is not available to the complainant or informant.
FAQs on e-Verification Scheme, 2021 provide general guidance in understanding procedures & processes of the e-Verification Scheme, 2021
Get answers to FAQs on filling up ITR forms for AY 2022-23. Learn about reporting residential status for non-residents, directorship in foreign companies, sale of land, unlisted equity shares, and more. Understand PAN requirements, reporting foreign assets, and details for unlisted foreign companies. Clarifications on PAN reporting for delisted companies and ISIN details for LTCG. Stay informed about specific disclosures for different scenarios and ensure accurate ITR form submissions.
ITAT Delhi held that addition of interest free security deposit sustained as the same is not refunded to the Developer even after lapse of more than seven years by merely stating that the Developer had not provided completion certificate.
Vijayawada Division’s Income Tax Department warns against false refund claims and wrongful deductions. Learn the consequences and rectify claims now.
Delhi High Court held that show cause notice issued after the expiry of the prescribed period under section 28(9) of the Customs Act, 1962 would not survive in law.
