Exploring the landmark CESTAT ruling in Manmade Spinners India Ltd Vs Commissioner of CGST case which clarifies that cash refund is permissible for an assessee operating under Central Excise Exemption Notification.
Delhi High Court granted interim bail on petitioner satisfying the test of proviso to section 45(1) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA) as petitioner is suffering from life-threatening diseases warranting immediate medical attention.
Understand the nuances of a charge under the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, exploring its essentials, differences from mortgages, and the distinction between fixed and floating charges. Delve into legal intricacies, including crystallization of charges and relevant case laws, to grasp the complexities associated with property transactions.
Madras High Court didn’t entertained the writ petitioner as appeal remedy available before the appropriate authority. Accordingly, petitioner directed to preferred appeal under the provisions of TNGST Act, 2017.
Learn about the vendor assessment process on the GeM portal, its benefits for sellers, and the necessary documents required for assessment. Professional Utilities offers expert services for GeM vendor assessment.
Dive into the complexities of corporate compliance, exploring legal obligations and challenges faced by businesses. From regulatory frameworks to anti-corruption laws, data protection, occupational health and safety, and India-specific challenges like labor laws and GST, understand the multifaceted landscape. Stay informed to navigate the dynamic legal environment and ensure ethical business practices.
A comprehensive analysis of ITAT Pune’s landmark judgement in the Subhash Devidas Mind Vs PCIT case, wherein a revision order passed during the Covid-19 pandemic was quashed.
Gain insights into the landmark ruling by the Calcutta High Court in SKP Infrarealty Pvt Ltd. & Anr vs Union of India case, regarding non-participation in income tax proceedings and the principle of natural justice.
Calcutta High Court, in the case of Liakhat Ali Mallick v. State of West Bengal, set aside the order requiring the assessee to make a pre-deposit of 20% of the interest liability. Gain insights into the ruling and its implications for GST cases.
In present facts of the case, the Hon’ble Bombay High Court have held that Section 27 (3) expressly states that an obligation of a limited liability partnership, whether arising in contract or otherwise, shall be solely the obligation of the limited liability partnership.
