Discover the key highlights and implications of SEBI’s (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Second Amendment Regulations, 2023, announced on June 14. Explore changes in mainstream media coverage, appointment of compliance officers, and revised deadlines for compliance. Understand the impact on director appointments, disclosure requirements, and business responsibility reports. Stay informed about the amendments’ broader implications for listed entities and the steps needed to ensure compliance and enhance governance.
Explore the recent ruling by the Hon’ble Calcutta High Court on the denial of Input Tax Credit (ITC) based on the retrospective cancellation of a supplier’s GST registration. Learn about the case of M/s Gargo Traders, where the HC set aside the order and directed the department to consider the petitioner’s claim afresh. Understand the key issues involved, facts of the case, and contentions of both the applicant and the department.
Learn about Expression of Interest (EOI) under Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016. Explore Regulation 36A, detailing the issuance of EOI by resolution professionals for corporate debtors’ revival. Understand key details, eligibility criteria, documents required, and the publication process. Definitions and regulations provided under Section 5(26), Section 5(25), and Section 3(8) of IBC, 2016. Discover where EOIs are published and the prescribed form for publication.
Many fintech startups in India have set up foreign holding companies (HoldCo) for attracting investment from offshore venture capital and private equity funds, taking advantage of favourable foreign regulatory regimes, better protection of intellectual property, easier access to capital and product markets and option of overseas listing.
DGFT announces modification of SION E-121, which relates to export of Refined Soyabean Oil (Edible grade) vide Public Notice No. 16/2023 DGFT Dated: 21st June, 2023
CESTAT held that the utilization of credit by any unit within the same entity would not cause any loss to the Exchequer. This is because the credit disallowed to one unit is proportionally made available to the second unit. From a company’s perspective, the net credit availed and utilized remains unchanged.
Delve into judgment of CESTAT Kolkata in the case of Pecon Computech Pvt Ltd Vs Commissioner of CGST & Excise, underlining non-applicability of unjust enrichment in context of Service Tax refunds
CESTAT Mumbai held that services provided by appellant (Commission agent) to their foreign principals is ‘export of service’ as contemplated under rule 3 of the 2005 Export Rules.
Allahabad High Court held that once the registration is granted, the same could be cancelled only in terms of the conditions prescribed under Section 29(2) and allegedly being a bogus firm is not a ground enumerated under Section 29(2) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.
Delhi High Court held that rule 89(4) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 applies only in case of zero rated supply of goods or services, without payment of tax under bond or letter of undertaking. Accordingly, provisions are inapplicable to cases of refund of integrated tax paid on zero rated supply.
