If sales are not disputed, entire alleged bogus purchases cannot be disallowed and only the gross profit on the alleged purchases to be disallowed. No penalty under section 271(1)(c) is leviable on estimated additions.
Yes, the season for filing income tax returns is coming closure. Don’t wait for Form-16 and utilise your Sundays in accumulating the documents required for filing return of income.
Provisions of Section 9 of IBC mandates Operational creditor to file CIRP application against Corporate Debtor after expiry of 10 days from date of receipt of demand notice by Corporate Debtor,
ITAT held that if a Penalty notice is vague then penalty proceedings initiated under section 271(1)(c) on that basis were vitiate
The provisions of Section 107 of the Act deal with ‘Appeal’ and provide that an appeal be filed as against any order of the State Goods and Services Tax Act within a period of 90 days. There is a condonable period of one month after the aforesaid period of 90 days, for which the authority may grant condonation, if convinced by the explanation set out by the petitioner. The appeal of petitioner has been filed after a period of 2 months and 17 days, over and above the statutory limitation of 90 + 30 days.
CESTAT held that where service provider had deployed his employees in manufacturing premises of appellant for specified job works, the same cannot be held as Manpower Supply Services.
Unnati Alloys Pvt Ltd. Vs C.C.E. & S.T. (CESTAT Ahmedabad) Shri Jitendra Singh, Learned Counsel along with Ms. Reena Rawat, Advocate appeared for the appellants and he submits that as per the impugned order there is no independent finding against the appellants and the adjudicating authority has directly imposed the penalty without giving any reasoning. […]
Manjulata Sahoo Vs PCIT (ITAT Cuttack) It was the submission that against the order of the Tribunal, the assessee has filed appeal before the Hon’ble Jurisdictional High court of Orissa and the Hon’ble Jurisdictional High Court of Orissa was pleased to admit the appeal of the assessee in ITA No.8 of 2021 vide order dated […]
Shri Duraisamy Shanmugasundaram Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) As per assessee’s submissions, the money deposited in NRE account was withdrawn by assessee’s parents in India. The same has been sourced to deposit the same in another NRO account from time to time. However, rejecting assessee’s explanation, Ld. AO held that the cash was not re-deposited within […]
Tzudi Forest Products Vs State of Assam (Guwahati High Court) The grievance of the petitioner is against the action of the respondents in seeking road permit for transporting goods/forest products after obtaining e-way bills. It is the case of the petitioner that previously, there were check gates but, however after coming into effect the Goods […]
