Directorate General of GST Intelligence Vs Nikit Mittal (Jharkhand High Court) This Court has perused the order passed in W.P.(Cr.) No. 415 of 2018 and other analogous cases and Cont. Case (Cvl) No. 665 of 2019 and other analogous cases as also the order passed by the writ Court in W.P.(Cr.) No. 14 of 2019 […]
Alkem Laboratories Limited Vs Joint Commissioner of Sales Tax (Calcutta High Court) Petitioner has filed this writ petition being aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents Authority concerned in refunding the admitted refundable amount as indicated in pages 30,31 and 32 of the writ petition which comes around Rs.5,58,54,103.61 in total. Petitioner […]
CIT Vs Sikhya ‘O’ Anusandhan (Orissa High Court) Court in the first round of litigation accepted the legal position that without there being a valid search warrant authorizing the search in the premises of the Assessee under Section 132 of the Act, the question of initiating proceedings under Section 153A of the Act did not […]
It is noticed that summons, notices and letters are being issued to taxpayers in a routine and casual manner and in piecemeal calling for information/documents and in many cases, the taxpayers were also required to furnish copies of returns and records which are very well available in the portal itself. This kind of attitude is viewed by the Trade bodies as harassment and pressure tactics and thus brings disrepute to the Department.
National Fertilizers Limited Vs Commissioner CGST & Service Tax (CESTAT Delhi) It is not possible to accept the contentions advanced by the learned counsel for the appellant. It is not in dispute that the issues that arose in all the three appeals were identical. It is true that the Department had filed one appeal only […]
All officers/officials of Department of Revenue are required to follow the following Cyber Security Guidelines issued by the NIC to ensure Cyber Security in Department:-
An object beneficial to a section of the public is an object of general public utility. But the section of the community sought to be benefited must be sufficiently defined and identifiable by some common quality of a public order or impersonal nature.
ITAT Mumbai held that addition under section 69 of the Income Tax Act based on tally data having various inherent discrepancy is unsustainable as AO failed to verify or ask the assessee to reconcile the same from actual books of accounts or physical stocks.
NCLAT Delhi held that an application by the Resolution Professional under section 60(5) of IBC, 2016, to direct the tenant to vacant the property of Corporate Debtor, permissible for carrying out the duties entrusted to the IRP under Section 18 of the Code.
NCLT Delhi held that this Adjudicating Authority is not a dispute redressal forum. Accordingly, so long as a dispute truly exists in fact and is not spurious, hypothetical and illusory, the adjudicating authority has to reject the application u/s. 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
