Interim relief in terms of deposit of fine in lieu of confiscation of vehicle being Rs. 2,50,062/- with penalty of Rs. 5,00,124/- under Section 129(1a) which included 200% of the tax amount and bond value against the release of the goods to the tune of Rs. 13,89,224/- as per GST MOV-10 should be furnished by assessee for release of the goods detained/ seized under that Section and no coercive steps or further order under Section 130 should be passed
If the cash sales and receipts were duly supported by relevant bills which were produced in the course of assessment proceedings, addition U/s 68 was unwarranted. Where cash sales transaction was recorded in regular books of accounts, sales were made out of stock-in-trade then no addition U/s 68 could be sustained.
ITAT Jaipur set aside the CIT(A) order as the same being non-speaking and cryptic order which is passed against the principles of natural justice as opportunity to the AO to ascertain the correct fact was not granted.
Expenses incurred by assessee-doctor on organizing musical programme for his professional colleagues, sponsoring garba event organized in the society where he resided and gifts given to fellow doctors on the occasion of marriage or diwali could not be said to be allowable under section 37 for computing his taxable income as all these expenses, could not be said to have been incurred wholly and exclusively for the profession of the assessee so as to qualify for deduction u/s 37(1).
Madras High Court held that as taxes are the main source of income for the Government to concentrate on the welfare of the people companies/firms/entities which evade payment of tax are liable to be punished under criminal charges with substantial penalties.
Is it possible for an assessee to be held responsible for the undeposited withheld tax if the person or entity that withheld the tax from the assessee’s income failed to do so?
Government has now made changes in the applicable Rules related to refund to consumers/ unregistered persons for cancelled contracts and where the time limit for making any changes by the supplier of service has expired.
Explore critical pre-budget concerns for India’s 2023-24 fiscal year. Uncover challenges such as job generation, rural-urban employment disparities, and the impact of automation on job opportunities. Delve into the ailing state of the agricultural sector, highlighting issues like shrinking arable land, youth aversion to farming, and inadequate cold storage infrastructure. Lastly, scrutinize the mismanaged taxation system, addressing repressive indirect taxes and an inefficient direct tax structure. Will the upcoming budget effectively tackle these impending challenges and sustain the nation’s economic stability
Calcutta HC order in on how an order should not be drafted where Tribunal adopted finding of CIT(A) verbatim as its own findings
The Hon’ble Supreme Court observed while allowing the appeal that as per Circular No. 760 dated 13th January 1998, the CBDT have stated that in case of transactions which are, in substance, in the nature of hire-purchase, the receipts of hire charges would not be in the nature of interest and hence assessee were liable to pay interest under Interest-Tax Act, 1974.
