Join our webinar on July 24-25 for an in-depth analysis of Union Budget 2024. Learn about tax proposals, sector impacts, and investment insights. Register now!
Join CA Sachin Jain for a live course on Input Tax Credit from a litigation perspective. Gain practical insights and master ITC complexities. Register now!
Rajasthan VAT Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for outstanding demands created against such person (firms) who have not made any sale and / or purchase of goods
CESTAT Delhi held that penalty for non-payment of service tax not leviable when the assessee has proved reasonable cause for their bona fide belief of non-payment.
Delhi High Court held that Advertisement, Market and business Promotion (AMP) expenses incurred cannot be termed as an international transaction in the absence of any provision for the same in the agreement with Associated Enterprise.
Primary responsibility for ensuring timely filing of returns rests with the Assessing Officer. With the help of sub-ordinates, he should secure compliance of the filing of returns.
Delhi High Court held that the interim moratorium under Section 96 Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code in respect of one of the guarantors would not ipso facto apply against a co-guarantor.
CESTAT Mumbai held that for the same period excise duty is demanding alleging that activities undertaken by the appellants do amount to manufacture of Prefabricated building i.e. Green House and also service tax on activity of erection and commission of Greenhouse and Polyhouse at site. Accordingly, held that to ascertain the position, it is prudent to remand the matter to the adjudicating authority.
Madras High Court held that for contract entered prior to 01.07.2017 under National Highways and Public Works Department differential tax liability is to be computed as per Government Orders and any recovery affected from the contractor contrary to the methodology will be refunded.
The Delhi High Court observed that on the issue of phonetic similarity in the two trademarks, the test to be applied is of a man of average intelligence and of imperfect recollection. To such a man, the overall structural and phonetic similarity and the similarity of the idea in the two marks is reasonably likely to cause a confusion between them.
ITAT Pune held that interest u/s 201(1A) was charged on account of ex-facie delay in depositing the deducted tax within the stipulated due dates and such levy is automatic and without escapement.
ITAT Bangalore held that as per provisions of section 43B(f) of the Income Tax Act deduction on leave encashment is available on actual payment basis and not available on accrual basis.
