Madras HC quashes assessment orders against Anantham Retail Pvt. Ltd. for tax years 2019-22. Violation of natural justice cited. Learn more.
Bangalore International Airport Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) Assessee submitted that Professional or Legal Service expenditure was incurred wholly in connection with entering into various agreements. Most of the expenditure was towards availing of professional and legal services during pre-operative period i.e. before commencement of the commercial operation. In our considered opinion, this expenditure is […]
Inductotherm India Pvt Ltd Vs C.C. (CESTAT Ahmedabad) Only ground on which the department has been denying the exemption Notification No. 25/2002-Cus dated 01.03.2002 is that the subject imported goods are exempted only if it is imported and used by the IT Industries whereas, in the appellant’s case the industry is not IT Industry but […]
C. R. Dadhich Memorial Society Vs CIT(E) (ITAT Delhi) Training means & constitutes a basic concept in human resource development. It is concerned with developing a particular skill to a desired standard by instruction and practice. Training is a highly useful tool that can bring a person into a position where they can do their […]
Saireddy Pruthviraj Reddy Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) It is pleaded by the assessee before us that while receiving the flat No. 914, the mother of the assessee valued the same at Rs. 27,23,000/-and offered to tax the capital gains arising therefrom. On this premise the assessee insists that the cost of acquisition of plot No. […]
Respondent submitted that the show cause notice issued was on the basis of the balance sheet wherein all activities of the assessee were truly declared. Therefore, there was no suppression of material facts.
Shrikrishna Khandsari Sugar Mills Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) The only issue raised in this appeal is against the confirmation of disallowance of Rs.4,19,970/- made by the Assessing Officer (AO) in respect of agricultural expenses. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the assessee has been engaged in manufacturing and trading in Khandsari sugar […]
ITAT held that when addition was made on estimation basis that by itself does not lead to conclusion that assessee either concealed the particulars of income or furnished inaccurate particulars of such income.
High Court held that the provisions of Section 194J applied to the retainer doctors and not those of Section 192.
Swami Shibrupananda Jayrambati Ramkrishna Saradamath & Mission Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata) Ld. AO had taken two views in respect of same transaction/bank deposits made by the assessee, one pre-demonetization period deposits, which he treated as income from profession of the assessee and 50% of such deposits treated as income from profession. On the other hand, […]
