Assessee contended that CIT(A) erred in confirming levy of penalty under section 271F of the Income Tax Act, 1961 of Rs. 5,000 for failure to file return of income in response to the notice issued under section 148.
DCIT Vs Kingfisher Capital CLO. Ltd. (ITAT Mumbai) At the very outset, it is brought to the notice of the Bench that respondent-assessee company has since been liquidated by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCALT) vide order dated 07.11.2019 and as such no longer in existence. In view of the matter, we are of […]
Share India Vs CIT (ITAT Hyderabad) A careful examination of clause (1)(b)(ii) of section 12AA, cited above, clearly indicates that the Ld. CIT(E) shall refuse registration only if he is not satisfied about the objects and the genuineness of the activities of the institution. A perusal of the order passed by the Ld. CIT(E) demonstrates […]
Discover the essentials of Advance Tax under the Income Tax Act, 1961. Learn who is liable, when to pay, and how much to pay. Uncover the consequences of non-payment and the benefits of fulfilling your Advance Tax obligations. Ensure a smooth tax journey with key insights and timely payments.
Delve into the analysis of the recent Supreme Court judgment dated June 3, 2022, in Vallal RCK Vs. M/s Siva Industries and Holdings Limited. Explore insights on the objective of section 12A and whether the Adjudicating Authority can question the commercial wisdom of the Committee of Creditors. Stay informed about key observations and conclusions from this significant case in the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code context.
