Sacheerome Advanced Technologies (SAT) Vs NEC Technologies Pvt. Ltd. (NECI) (Delhi High Court) In the present case, the petitioner did not make any application challenging the appointment of learned Arbitrator under Section 13 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (A&C Act); it filed an application styled as under Section 16 read with Section 14(1)(a) […]
Mrs. Umadevi Nambiar Vs Thamarasseri Roman Catholic Diocese (Supreme Court of India) As a matter of plain and simple fact, deed of Power of Attorney did not contain a clause authorizing the agent to sell the property though it contained two express provisions, one for leasing out the property and another for executing necessary documents […]
Radico Khaitan Limited Vs Sarao Distillery (OPC) Pvt. Ltd (Delhi High Court) The present injunction application has been filed seeking ad interim injunction in respect of the use of the mark ‘EVENING MOMENT’ by the Defendants, which is deceptively similar to the Plaintiff’s mark ‘MAGIC MOMENTS’ registered in Class 33 for alcoholic beverages. A perusal […]
Rajeshwari Vs Bhunu Ram (Chhattisgarh High Court) Section 20 of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 speaks about the maintenance of children and aged parents. Sub section(3) of Section 20 causes obligation of a person to maintain his or her aged or infirm parent or a daughter who is unmarried, as the case may […]
Realization Stock & Equity Pvt. Ltd. Vs. ITO (Calcutta High Court) One of the reasons for reopening of assessment is that no regular assessment under Section 143 (3) of the Act was made in the instant case and even in the last paragraph of the said reason again it has been recorded again that no […]
Respondents were directed to either re-open the online portal so as to enable the Petitioners to file TRAN-I form electronically for claiming tax credit or to accept the same manually on or before 30.06.2021 and process the same in accordance with law.
The order states that the members of the company had passed a special resolution to alter the main objects clause of the Memorandum of Association at an Extraordinary General Meeting held on January 30, 2021. As per Section 117 of the Companies Act, 2013, the resolution was required to be filed within 30 days. However, the company filed the required form, MGT-14, with a delay of 261 days.
Porteck India Info Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Goods & Service Tax & Central Excise (CESTAT Delhi) CESTAT finds that the action of the Asstt. Commissioner, of issuing of fresh show cause notice, instead of granting refund, in terms of Final Order of this Tribunal amounts to interference in the justice delivery system. […]
The applicant in spite of being a Tax consultant, he has deliberately indulged in the issuance of fake invoices to pass the illegal Input Tax Credit to the endusers and thus defrauded the Govt. Exchequer from its huge legitimate GST revenue.
Sree Constructions Vs Assistant Commissioner (ST) (Andhra Pradesh High Court) Sub- Section (4) of Section 75 of CGST Act, reads as under:- ‘An opportunity of hearing shall be granted where a request is received in writing from the person chargeable with tax or penalty, or where any adverse decision is contemplated against such person.’ It […]
