Fees under Para 2.108 (c) (iv) of Handbook of Procedure, 2015-20 is revised from existing Fee not exceeding Rs.200/- per certificate as may be prescribed by concerned agency to Fee of Rs.200/- per certificate.
The Government of Karnataka vide Gazette Notification No.RD/04/LRD/2019 dated February 08, 2021 had notified the formation of a new district in the State of Karnataka. It has been decided to assign the lead bank responsibility of the new district as under:
If you have not read the latest and hotly discussed RBI guidelines on appointment of Statutory Central Auditors (SCAS)/Statutory Auditors of Commercial Banks (excluding RRBs), UCBs and NBFCs (including HFCs) dated April 27, 2021, let me reproduce the same below for ready reference from RBI website. Let us discuss the above guidelines in the light of […]
1. (1) These regulations may be called the Chartered Accountants (Amendment) Regulations, 2021. (2) They shall come into force on the date of their final publication in the Official Gazette.
Case No. (OI – 05/2021) Initiation of Anti-Dumping Original Investigation concerning imports of Soda Ash from United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Russia.
The suit for malicious prosecution having been filed on 11th April 2008 which was within the period of one year, was therefore well within the limitation prescribed under The Limitation Act, 1963. Hence, the suit was well within limitation, as the period of limitation under Section 3 and Section 12 of the Limitation Act, 1962, r/w Entry 74 of the Schedule of the Limitation Act, would have ended only on 12th April 2008, which was one day after the date when the suit for malicious prosecution was presented by the Plaintiff/Respondent.
Syschem India Limited Vs Union of India & Ors (Delhi High Court) 1. Hon’ble Delhi High Court issued notice in a writ petition seeking direction to revenue for processing of IGST refund on account of export of goods alongside seeking direction to revenue for payment of due interest from the date of shipping bill. 2. […]
Seema Jain Vs Joint Commissioner Central Goods And Service Tax Ludhiana (Punjab & Haryana High Court) FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT Prayer in this petition is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner for offences under Section 132 (1) (b) & (c) punishable under Section 132 (1) (i) […]
Manav Mangal Society Vs DCIT (ITAT Chandigarh) Conclusion: Since the specified persons possessed the requisite qualifications and rendered the services, therefore, it cannot be held that payment of salary to the specified persons was unreasonable particularly when no comparable case was cited by AO. Therefore, the exemption could not be denied under section 13(1)(c). Held: […]
Notice issued by AO was bad in law since it did not specify under which limb of section 271(1)(c), the penalty proceedings had been initiated i.e. whether for concealment of income or for furnishing of inaccurate particular of income and merely because AO had treated the business loss claimed by assessee as speculation loss, the same could not tantamount to concealment of income warranting levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c).
