CBDT notifies pension fund, namely, ‘OMERS Administration Corporation’ under sub-clause (iv) of clause (c) of the Explanation 1 to clause (23FE) of section 10 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 in respect of the eligible investment made by it in India on or after 13th May 2021 but on or before the 31st day of March, […]
CBDT notifies pension fund, namely, ‘Government Employees Superannuation Board’ under sub-clause (iv) of clause (c) of the Explanation 1 to clause (23FE) of section 10 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 in respect of the eligible investment made by it in India on or after 13th May 2021 but on or before the 31st day of […]
CBDT notifies pension fund, namely, ‘Public Sector Pension Investment Board’ under sub-clause (iv) of clause (c) of the Explanation 1 to clause (23FE) of section 10 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 in respect of the eligible investment made by it in India on or after 13th May 2021 but on or before the 31st day […]
CBDT notifies ‘Ministry of Economy and Finance of Republic of Korea’ as sovereign wealth fund under sub-clause (vi) of clause (b) of the Explanation 1 to clause (23FE) of section 10 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 vide Notification No. 63/2021 -Income Tax Dated: 13th May 2021. MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Revenue) (CENTRAL BOARD OF […]
CBDT notifies ‘CDC Group Plc.’ as sovereign wealth fund under sub-clause (vi) of clause (b) of the Explanation 1 to clause (23FE) of section 10 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 vide Notification No. 62/2021 -Income Tax Dated: 13th May 2021. MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Revenue) (CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES) New Delhi Notification No. […]
Whether the time limit prescribed for filing refund claim of SAD paid by the importer is one year in terms of Notification No. 93/2008(Cus) dated 01.08.2008 which has been issued in terms of section 25(1) of the Customs Act, 1962 without selling the imported goods by the importer within one year of payment of SAD shall be applicable or not needs to be referred to the Larger Bench of Tribunal.
Since AO passed the assessment order and accepted the return filed by assessee after examining the issue regarding increase in capital account as assessee had credited his capital account with agricultural income and the capital gain from sale of flats and had reflected that same in its capital account, therefore, CIT had exceeded jurisdiction under section 263 by directing AO to make fresh assessment on the issues which were not the subject matter of the AO’s limited scrutiny.
India Resurgence Arc Private Limited Vs M/s. Amit Metaliks Limited & Anr. (Supreme Court of India) “Equality” means equality among equals or within the same class. In the present facts of the case, the appellant company is said to be the assignee of the rights, title and interest carried by Religare Finvest Limited as secured […]
