In re BG Elevators and Escalators Private Limited (GST AAR Karnataka) What is the Rate of tax required in respect of erecting and commissioning of lifts installed for domestic use and What is the Rate of tax required in respect of erecting and commissioning of escalators installed for domestic use? The rate of GST applicable […]
In re URC Construction Private Limited (GST AAR Odisha) Question : What is the applicable rate of Goods and Service Tax [GST] on the Contract awarded by Ms. NBCC (INDIA) LIMITED , an Executing Agency of behalf of Ms. SAIL, for construction of ISPAT Post graduate Medical Institute and super specialty Hospital at Rourkela Steel Plant […]
In re Pioneer Bakers (GST AAR Odisha) Q. (a)Whether supply of Cakes, bakery items, ice creams, chocolates, drinks and other eatable products prepared at the premises of the applicant and supplied to the customers from the counter with the facility to consume the same in the air-conditioned premises itself covered under the restaurant services? Ans: […]
Like anyone interested in the basic accounting of e commerce entities, the newest babies to churn the accounting world, the recent guiding note on accounting by e commerce entities by Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, popularly known as ICAI, is a welcome and timely move. Yes, I do care to give its website details […]
In re Shekhar Bhagwan Gore (GST AAR Maharashtra) FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF AUTHORITY OF ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA The present application has been filed under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act” […]
ORRIGENDUM NOTIFICATION on Initiation of anti-dumping investigation concerning imports of Melamine originating in or exported from the European Union, Japan, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates.
In the Income-tax Rules, 1962, in rule 10V, in sub-rule (12), after the second proviso and before the Explanation, the following provisos shall be inserted, namely:‑ Provided also that the provisions of sub-rules (3) to (12) of rule 10VA shall, mutatis mutandis, apply to the application made under the second proviso as they apply to application made under sub-rule (2) of the said rule:
To issue any direction to the respondents by which a registered person can edit any error if occurred during submitting/offsetting the ITC and before filing of the GSTR-3b return
Deduction of TDS in respect of aggregate Cash Withdrawal above Rs. 20 lakh by an account holder of National (Small) Savings Schemes for non ITR filer under section 194N of I.T. Act 1961.
Since there was no response by the appellant at any stage either when the cheques were issued, or after the presentation to its banker, or after the legal notices were served informing the appellant that both the cheques on being presented to its banker were returned with a note that it could not be honoured because of “insufficient funds” and there was no evidence to rebut the presumption that the cheques were issued for consideration, therefore, the High Court had not committed any error in recording the finding of guilt of the appellant and convicting her for an offence being committed under Section 138 under its impugned judgment.
