It has been clarified that in a private dispute between husband and wife, the basic protection afforded by virtue of the exemption from disclosure enacted under Section 8(1)(j) cannot be lifted or disturbed unless the petitioner is able to justify how such disclosure would be in ‘public interest’.
On the ground that charge sheet was not filed within the prescribed period, an application for bail under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. was filed by the appellant. The High Court ruled in his favour by holding that the appellant is entitled to bail under Section 167 as a complete charge sheet was not filed within the prescribed period. While granting bail, the High Court held that the appellant can be re-arrested after the charge sheet is filed.
FNF India Private Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore) The brief facts are that the AO denied deduction of gratuity paid. The assessee submitted before the CIT(Appeals) that it had created a provision for gratuity amounting to Rs.1,4769,903 and that Rs.44,22,139 was actually paid to the employees. In its return of income, the assessee had erroneously […]
Tata Sky Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) By virtue of this Miscellaneous Application, the assessee on a limited aspect seeks to recall the order of this Tribunal on one particular issue alone with regard to upholding the disallowance made u/s.40(a)(ia) of the Act on year end provision for expenses on the ground that while rendering […]
ICSI has made a representation to Ministry of Corporate Affairs and requested for extension of due dates of Companies Fresh Start Scheme, 2020 (CFSS- 2020), LLP Settlement Scheme, 2020, Scheme for relaxation of time for filing forms related to creation or modification of charges under the Act, Holding Board Meeting through Video Conferencing and Companies […]
Kapoor Watch Company Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) Hon’ble Court held that maintenance charges must form a part of the rent while calculating the annual value of property u/s 23(1) of the Act for the purpose of Section 22 of the Act. However, in the present assessee company’s case, the common area maintenance charges […]
DCIT Vs Ritesh Properties & Industries Ltd. (ITAT Delhi) 1. Foreign travel expense not allowable if no nexus between travel & business purpose Though the counsel submits that the action of the CIT(A) in upholding the disallowance of Rs.7,02,655/- on the ground that the said expenditure was incurred for foreign travel for personal purposes is […]
Prism Cement Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) We observed that assessee has earned exempt income of Rs. 12,62,95,486/- and made a suo moto disallowance of Rs. 29,87,943/-. After careful consideration of the assessment order passed by the AO and the order passed by Ld. CIT(A), it is fact on record that AO has not recorded […]
1. Retaining by-products/scrap by job-worker – GST applicable? The High Court of Andhra Pradesh in the case of Shirdiri Sainath Industries Vs DCST 2020-TIOL-2052-HC-AP-GST has held including the value of by-products to the milling charges and assessing tax is legally unsustainable. Fact: Rice milling done on job work bases. milling charges was per quintal basis […]
Notification No. 02/2021-Customs (N.T.) – CBIC rescinds Customs (Advance Rulings) Rules 2002 which were notified by notification o No. 55/2002-Customs (NT), dated the 23rd August,2002. GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF FINANCE (DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE) New Delhi, the 04 January, 2021 Notification No. 02/2021-Customs (N.T.) G.S.R._________ (E). – In exercise of the powers conferred by section […]
